Delhi HC directs Centre to decide on representation over draft Health Data Management Policy
New Delhi, September 3: The Delhi High Court on Thursday directed the Central government to decide the representation of a petitioner on the draft Health Data Management Policy under the National Digital Health Mission. The bench was hearing a petition filed by disability rights defender Doctor Satender Singh, who was represented by advocates Rajshekhar…
New Delhi [India], September 3 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Thursday directed the Central government to decide the representation of a petitioner on the draft Health Data Management Policy under the National Digital Health Mission.
A division bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan clarified that the issues of the inadequacy of the consultation process would be decided if it is challenged after the framing of policy.
The bench was hearing a petition filed by disability rights defender Doctor Satender Singh, who was represented by advocates Rajshekhar Rao, Vrinda Bhandari, and Sanjana Srikumar.
The petitioner said that the consultation for the Draft Health Data Management Policy does not ensure effective public participation as the time period for the consultation is only fifteen days; and the Draft Policy has been circulated only through the internet, to the exclusion of other media, and only in English, to the exclusion of other languages.
The plea sought to extend the notice period of the consultation of the ‘National Digital Health Mission: Health Data Management Policy’ till the restrictions /lockdowns in place under the Disaster Management Act for COVID-19 pandemic subsist; or for a minimum period of 60 days.
“Issue a Declaration that undertaking any online public consultation process for draft policies or legislation during a public health emergency/crisis, such as COVID-19, without providing alternative arrangements for those excluded on account of language or disability or internet access is illegal and unconstitutional,” the plea said.
The petitioner also said notice inviting Consultation dated August 26, 2020, issued by the respondent is unreasonably short, illegal, null and void.
The respondents have provided only 15 days, till September 10, 2020, to the public, in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, to submit their response through an online form, uploaded on the National Digital Health Mission’s official website.
The original notice for consultation had provided eight days, till September 3, 2020, which was suddenly changed and extended to September 10, 2020, without any specific public announcement on August 31, 2020, reflecting the respondents’ implied acknowledgement of the unduly short time period given initially, the plea said. (ANI)
ANA NEWS WIRE Disclaimer:
The African News Agency (ANA) is a news wire service and therefore subscribes to the highest standards of journalism as it relates to accuracy, fairness and impartiality.
ANA strives to provide accurate, well sourced and reliable information across Text, Images and Video. Where errors do appear, ANA will seek to correct these timeously and transparently.
The ANA platform also contains news and information from third party sources. ANA has sought to procure reliable content from trusted news sources but cannot be held responsible for the accuracy and opinions provided by such sources on the ANA platform or linked sites.
The content provided for on the ANA News Wire platform, both through the ANA news operation and via its third party sources, are for the sole use of authorised subscribers and partners. Unauthorised access to and usage of ANA content will be subject to legal steps. ANA reserves its rights in this regard.
ANA makes every effort to ensure that the website is up and running smoothly at all times, however ANA does not take responsibility for, and will not be held liable for times when the website is temporarily unavailable due to technical issues that are beyond our control.