Committee fears for Affordable Inputs Programme
The Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture has condemned the government for failing to open up clearly on the progress made in preparations for the 2022/ 23 Affordable Inputs Programme. This also comes against the background that in April this year, President Lazarus Chakwera directed Minister of Agriculture Lobin Lowe to conclude the AIP preparations by…
The Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture has condemned the government for failing to open up clearly on the progress made in preparations for the 2022/23 Affordable Inputs Programme (AIP).
This also comes against the background that in April this year, President Lazarus Chakwera directed Minister of Agriculture Lobin Lowe to conclude the AIP preparations by September or lose his job.
The Civil Society Agriculture Network (Csanet) has also warned that “planning to reform AIP during the season is planning to fail.”
The committee’s Chairperson Sameer Suleman said nothing is working as according to the information that his committee has, the country has only16,000 metric tonnes of fertiliser against 400, 000 metric tonnes that are needed.
He went on to say that the beneficiaries were yet to be identified and that the farmers club that were to be used in dispersing the AIP fertiliser were yet to be identified.
“For now, we should say the way things look, there is no AIP, maybe they just want to buy the fertiliser and give it to their people not for Malawians because there is no fertiliser for Malawians, we should say the truth,” Sameer said.
He argued that the Ministry of Agriculture had failed to forge ahead with the programme as by this time of the year the supplier of the commodity could have been known.
“There is a total mess and it is surprising to us that they are so relaxed when people out there do not have hope, they don’t know what they will do because they cannot afford to go in a shop and buy fertiliser,” he said.
Suleman raised fears that the K109 billion pumped into the programme for the coming season would be wasted.
Cisanet National Director Lillian Saka indicated that the network considered AIP as an important programme for farmers regardless of its weaknesses.
“There are farmers who depend on it, and when it does not work, it directly affects their livelihood and at the end of the day farmers get blamed for not utilising AIP effectively,” Saka said.
She said that the anticipated delay was of concern because there would be pressure on both the service providers and the beneficiaries.
Ministry of Agriculture spokesperson Gracian Lungu refused to comment on the matter.
Last year, AIP was marred with several challenges, including some fertiliser suppliers pulling off the programme after disagreeing with government over prices.
In the 2021/2022 growing season, the programme targeted 3.7 million farmers using K142 billion but not all farmers managed to redeem their two bags of fertiliser due to logistical challenges.
Reports indicate that the number of beneficiaries has been reduced by half in the 2022/23 growing season due to the increase in fertiliser cost.
ANA NEWS WIRE Disclaimer:
The African News Agency (ANA) is a news wire service and therefore subscribes to the highest standards of journalism as it relates to accuracy, fairness and impartiality.
ANA strives to provide accurate, well sourced and reliable information across Text, Images and Video. Where errors do appear, ANA will seek to correct these timeously and transparently.
The ANA platform also contains news and information from third party sources. ANA has sought to procure reliable content from trusted news sources but cannot be held responsible for the accuracy and opinions provided by such sources on the ANA platform or linked sites.
The content provided for on the ANA News Wire platform, both through the ANA news operation and via its third party sources, are for the sole use of authorised subscribers and partners. Unauthorised access to and usage of ANA content will be subject to legal steps. ANA reserves its rights in this regard.
ANA makes every effort to ensure that the website is up and running smoothly at all times, however ANA does not take responsibility for, and will not be held liable for times when the website is temporarily unavailable due to technical issues that are beyond our control.